Welcome to our class!
We are an environmental science course at St. Benedict's Prep in Newark, NJ, taught by Mrs. T. We'll be blogging about environmental issues all term, so please stay tuned!
Monday, February 27, 2012
Invasive Plants
Many native Japanese plants are extremely popular in American landscaping (examples are the Japanese maple, honeysuckle, and barberry). However, these plants - particularly the last two mentioned - are highly invasive and push out native vegetation. Should the sale of these plants be banned? Defend your position.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Deer Culls in New Jersey
Garret Mountain, in Passaic County, has an unsustainably large deer population. The animals have virtually destroyed the forest understory, and often migrate onto local highways. However, efforts to have a deer cull are met with resistance by local residents. Create a list of the pros and cons of a deer cull. Then, state your position on whether or not you support the cull, and explain why.
Friday, January 13, 2012
The Precautionary Principle
The precautionary principle is: Actions should be taken to prevent damage to the environment even in cases where there is no absolute proof of a causal link between emissions or activity and detrimental environmental effect. Embedded in this is the notion that there should be a reversal of the “burden of proof” whereby the onus is now on the operator to prove that his action will not cause harm rather than on the environment to prove that harm (is occurring or) will occur.
Translation: Even if you don't know something will hurt the environment, you should take steps to prevent something like that from happening. It is our responsibility to show that what we do will not hurt the environment, rather than wait for the environment to show that it was harmed.
Do you accept or reject the precautionary principle? In other words, should those who wish to introduce a new chemical, a new industrial process, a land-use change, and so on, have to demonstrate that their change will not harm the environment before proceeding? Explain and defend your answer.
Translation: Even if you don't know something will hurt the environment, you should take steps to prevent something like that from happening. It is our responsibility to show that what we do will not hurt the environment, rather than wait for the environment to show that it was harmed.
Do you accept or reject the precautionary principle? In other words, should those who wish to introduce a new chemical, a new industrial process, a land-use change, and so on, have to demonstrate that their change will not harm the environment before proceeding? Explain and defend your answer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)